Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations

Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
Real Democracy for Iran!
Support Denamrk
Million Voices for Darfur
milblogs
Prev | List | Random | Next | Join
Powered by RingSurf!

e-Syndication

July 15, 2004

Hello China, Hello Taiwan

by Gary Farber of Amygdala at July 15, 2004 5:53 PM

Gary Farber's home blog is Amygdala.

It being summer, sing that to the tune of the great Allan Sherman's Hello, Muddah, Hello, Faddah.

If you can laugh.

Summer Pulse '04 is here. As announced on June 3rd by the Navy:

WASHINGTON (Jun. 3, 2004) -- The Department of Defense announced June 2 that this summer, simultaneous deployment of seven aircraft carrier strike groups (CSGs) will demonstrate the ability of the Navy to provide credible combat power across the globe by operating in five theaters with other U.S., allied and coalition military forces.
“Summer Pulse 04” will be the Navy’s first exercise of its new operational construct, the Fleet Response Plan (FRP). FRP is about new ways of operating, training, manning, and maintaining the fleet that results in increased force readiness and the ability to provide significant combat power to the President in response to a national emergency or crisis.

[...]

Under the FRP construct, the Navy can provide six CSGs in less than 30 days to support contingency operations around the globe, and two more CSGs can be ready in three months to reinforce or rotate with initially responding forces, to continue presence operations in other parts of the world, or to support military action in another crisis. Summer Pulse 04 will exercise the logistics and shore infrastructure necessary to execute a large scale surge operation, stress the operational concepts in the Navy’s Sea Power 21 strategy, and improve Navy interoperability with numerous allies and coalition partners, as well as other U.S. military forces.

Sounds rather bland and tame, doesn't it? As European Stars & Stripes put it:
Call it surging, or call it pulsing; it’s really just FDNF-ing. And nobody FDNFs like the USS Kitty Hawk, its sailors say.

“It’s what we do,” said Lt. Brook Dewalt, a Kitty Hawk spokesman.

So Summer Pulse 2004, the Navy’s first test of its new plan to be able to swiftly provide substantial sea-based combat power, isn’t causing many anxiety attacks on the nation’s only permanently forward-deployed aircraft carrier.

“We’re already positioned to get where we need to be in a pretty good fashion,” Dewalt said. “This is what the Forward Deployed Naval Forces does. When we get under way, we’re already deployed. We’re always on the leading edge. We are always surge-ready.”

The Kitty Hawk Carrier Strike Group is one of seven aircraft carrier strike groups surging, or pulsing, this summer, participating in the event that will put more than 50,000 sailors from seven aircraft carrier strike groups in exercises throughout the world’s seas, now through August.

All the other strike groups — the USS George Washington, USS John C. Stennis, USS John F. Kennedy, USS Harry S. Truman, USS Enterprise and USS Ronald Reagan are homeported in the U.S. and previously have been on a more regimented cycle for when the ships are at sea and when they’re in port.

Summer Pulse is a test of the Fleet Response Plan, which updates that old schedule with the idea of providing for a more flexible fleet that can deploy in strength faster than before.

In particular, the plan calls for six carrier strike groups to be ready to deploy within 30 days, and two more to be ready within 90 days. According to Adm. William Fallon, commander of the U.S. Fleet Forces Command and quoted on the command Web site, “It will signal to friends and potential adversaries that substantial sea-based combat power can respond on short notice.”
What's it really mean, Mr. Natural? I'm no mind reader, but I found this analysis from the Straits Times, of how the Chinese see it, which I read there back on June 5th, and which I can no longer find via search on their site, fairly persuasive:
According to a posting on Sina.com, an influential website in China, the signs point to a gathering of all seven CSGs in the Pacific.

Sources in Beijing say China's reading is that Summer Pulse is being mounted with it as the target audience, a suspicion reinforced by reports that Taiwanese forces are slated to join in the drill.

Clearly, given Beijing's repeated warning that it will use force, as a last resort and whatever the cost, to stop Taiwanese independence, the US feels it needs to send Beijing a message.

From past deployment patterns, the US usually dispatches one CSG to a trouble spot as a reminder of its presence.

It did so several times in the past when tension was high in the Taiwan Strait.

It sends two to indicate serious concern, as was the case when China test-fired missiles over the strait in 1996.

In a combat situation, it deploys three to four, which was what it did in the Gulf War in the early 1990s and the recent Iraqi war.

But never before has it sent in peace time seven CSGs to the same theatre.

The implications for China are grave.

According to Kanwa Defense News, which specializes in Chinese military matters, Beijing can cope with just one CSG currently.

'But in five to 10 years, it can certainly take on seven,' said Mr Chang Hong-yi, head of Kanwa, in an interview with The Straits Times.

'China's military potential is enormous and in terms of military technology, the gap with the US is closing fast,' he added.

However, a Chinese military source who declined to be identified is more sanguine.

'Even now, China can easily take on two CSGs,' he said but conceded that there was no way it could face seven all at the same time.

This means that if China has to wage war over Taiwan, it has to be able to land and seize control of the island within the first 30 days.

Otherwise, under the FRP, six CSGs may well arrive to join in the battle.

'All this leaves China with no choice but to start and end the war with lightning speed,' said the source.

Politically, Summer Pulse is likely to be seen by many Chinese as naked intimidation.

'This is gunboat diplomacy in the 21st century,' the source remarked, adding that it would remind the Chinese people of their century-long deep humiliation by Western powers -- and put Sino-US relations at peril.
China remains unhappy:

US should reconsider its Taiwan policies:

If the United States continues to send wrong signals to Taiwan in the present intensity of effort, then, there is the possibility that contingent event may break out across the Taiwan Straits.
US committed to one China, yet sells arms to Taiwan.

Summer Pulse '04 was publically announced on June 4th, though known to military sources for some time before. On June 5th, in clear response, China announced:

BEIJING - China's largest military exercises of the year, to take place this month, are meant to send a 'substantial warning' to Taiwan separatists, state media said yesterday.

The annual summer exercises will be held this year on Dongshan Island off the Chinese coast and include air, sea and land forces, China Youth Daily said.
Advertisement

Dongshan Island in south-eastern China's Fujian province is less than 280km west of Taiwan's Penghu Island.

The report did not say when the drills, said to be 'the People's Liberation Army's largest-scale exercise this year', would start or how long they would last, but similar drills in 2001 lasted for four months.

Neither did it say how many soldiers would take part in the amphibious mock Taiwan-landing backed by guided missiles, but the New Express Daily said last month that 18,000 troops would be involved.

The 2.5 million-strong PLA traditionally focused on land-based conflicts. But Beijing has spent heavily in recent years on its navy, building warships and landing craft that could support an invasion and other forces that could help blockade Taiwan.

The reference by the China Youth Daily to joint air, sea and land drills this year highlights recent efforts by Beijing to integrate its forces for complex manoeuvres - a key part of any possible attack on Taiwan, but one in which China lacks experience.

Chinese officials say the drills are routine, but state-controlled media often highlight their focus on capturing islands, a message clearly meant to intimidate Taiwan.

In the 2001 drills, some 100,000 soldiers were said to be engaged in amphibious exercises and mock warfare at sea, aimed at sinking an aircraft carrier.

Unlike previous exercises, this month's will aim at 'achieving control of the air', Beijing News reported.

'This change doesn't just show that the PLA's military theory has had an enormous change, but also indicates our military has acknowledged that control of the air is the top priority in modern warfare,' the report said.

Practically all the advanced weaponry China possesses will be used in the exercises, including the Sukhoi Su-27 fighter jets purchased from Russia, it said.

Nuclear-powered submarines, warships, the latest model missile destroyers and a guided missile brigade will also be involved.

'It's not a preventive military manoeuvre against Taiwan independence as they were in the past,' the report said, citing military experts.

'Instead, to a great extent, it is a self-initiated, vigorous military offensive aimed at sending a substantial warning to Taiwan,' it added.

Beijing Youth Daily said that Dongshan Island was picked for the drills not only because of its proximity to Taiwan but also for the similarity of its terrain to Taiwan's.

The drills are being staged amid speculation that the America is planning a massive show of force - including what was said to be the unprecedented deployment of seven aircraft carrier strike groups - in an exercise code-named Operation Summer Pulse 04 in the Pacific Ocean near China after mid-July.

Meanwhile, Taiwan's Defence Ministry has confirmed for the first time that the island has drawn up plans for a military offensive against China, Taiwanese newspaper China Times reported.

But the report did not say whether the plans included attacks on China's Three Gorges Dam or Hong Kong.
It's prudent of us to demonstrate to the Chinese that, though our Army may be tied up in Iraq, our Navy is not, and our capabilities in that regard, and of the Air Force, remain formidable.

Yesterday, reportedly in reaction to Condoleeza Rice's recent Chinese visit, we saw this:

China expressed grave concern Tuesday that recent U.S. support for Taiwan and Hong Kong was undermining Washington's commitment to its one-China policy.

The toughly worded statements, at a rare news conference called by the spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, came only days after a trip to Beijing by national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.

Both Rice and Vice President Dick Cheney -- who made a trip to Beijing in April -- have tried to keep a lid on China-Taiwan tensions but the effort seems to be having limited success.

Despite repeated reassurances that the United States stands by the one-China policy, Beijing has been increasingly vocal about its displeasure with Taiwan independence-seekers and with American support for the self-ruled island.

"We are gravely concerned over the recent U.S. moves on the Taiwan question," embassy spokesman Sun Wiede said in a formal statement.

"We strongly urge the U.S. side to stop selling advanced arms to Taiwan and cut the military links between the U.S. and Taiwan, stop any official exchanges with Taiwan authorities, stop supporting Taiwan to join the international organizations where statehood is required," he said.

"Only in this way can stable development of the China-U.S. relations as well as the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait be guaranteed," Sun said.

Later, answering questions, he added: "It's time for the United States to honor its commitments to the Chinese side."
The Chinese aren't happy. The Taiwanese are worried. This is scarcely the first time one can say that -- indeed, it's been an eternal verity since 1949 -- but these are very significant escalations, unprecedent in their scale on both sides, of force and saber-rattling. Take note.

Read The Rest Scale: as you wish for any, but I've quoted most of the relevant links.


TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.windsofchange.net/windsopcentre-cms/trackback.cgi/2964

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
"Hello China, Hello Taiwan"
Tracked: July 18, 2004 4:48 AM
Much, much ado. from Brainysmurf
Excerpt: Much, much ado. The yearly war exercizes off the coast of Fujian and various other developments are bringing attention back to The Question. Will China invade Taiwan? There's some confusion (at least on my part) as to what the Summer Pulse story means ...
Tracked: July 19, 2004 11:14 PM
Summer Pulse 04 Misinformation from Eye of the Storm
Excerpt: A couple of weeks ago I posted about Summer Pulse 04, the exercise that has put seven aircraft carriers to sea at one time.
Tracked: July 22, 2004 4:43 AM
Excerpt: There's been so much talk about it recently, but there's one question remaining: who would win? As a former naval reporter at Jane's, publishers of renowned journals Jane's Defence Weekly and Jane's Fighting Ships, I think I'm qualified to come up with...

Comments
#1 from praktike at 6:05 pm on Jul 15, 2004

wait a minute. doesn't this happen every time we review arms sales to taiwan?

#2 from Gary Farber at 6:32 pm on Jul 15, 2004

"wait a minute. doesn't this happen every time we review arms sales to taiwan?"

China growling? Certainly. Us sending seven carrier battle groups? No.

#3 from J Craig at 7:05 pm on Jul 15, 2004

There is indeed only one legitimate government in China - the democratically elected government based in Taiwan. The group in control of mainline China is a totalitarian regime which claims to be of the Communist persuasion (Government directed but not completely controlled economy, strong nationalism depended on racial identity - sounds more like the definition of Fascism). Since it does not “govern with the consent of the governed”, unlike the government in Taiwan, it is, by the theory of government under which the Unites States was formed, not a rightful government. We may have to deal with the Red “Communist” regime in mainline China, but we should never forget that it is not truly legitimate.

#4 from Gary Farber at 7:53 pm on Jul 15, 2004

"There is indeed only one legitimate government in China - the democratically elected government based in Taiwan."

There is, however, the minor fact that the KMT no longer is in power in Taiwan, and the party that is claims no sovereignty over China, but rather, that there are two Chinas, and they should be independent. Of course, you can tell them that they should have sovereignty over China. Best of luck with that, and the restoration of Bonnie Prince Charlie.

#5 from J Craig at 8:07 pm on Jul 15, 2004

I agree that they are now 'de facto' two separate countries. But 'de jure', according to the United States and virtually every other county on earth, they are only one country. I was making the point that in that territory considered part of one country, only one legitimate government exists.

As for Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Scottish parliament has slowly been acquiring more and more of the power and privileges of the governing body of a sovereign nation. To quote Mel Gibson, “Freedom!”.

#6 from HC at 8:08 pm on Jul 15, 2004

This is not the apocalyptic show of force imagined, with all seven carriers off Taiwan. The US has never sent seven carriers to one theatre in peacetime, and it is not starting now.

To begin, the Truman and the Enterprise are bound for the Mediterranean.

http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2004/nr20040701-0960.html

With the Kennedy relieving the Washington in the Persian Gulf, I can not see it reaching Taiwan either, and since the Washington is homeported in Norfolk I would expect to return by a route more direct than through Taiwan.

http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=13962

In support of that expectation, the Washington's June/July Ombudsman newsletter promises that their next port call is in a European city on the way home.

http://www.spear.navy.mil/gw/Ombudsman_News_June.pdf

This leaves three carriers for the Pacific. Since the Stennis and Kitty Hawk are scheduled for dual carrier exercises in the 'Western Pacific', I would not be surprised if they happened to be in the vicinity of Taiwan, or at the least available to make a showing in that neighbourhood, though the Reagan looks like it will make a beeline for San Diego.

http://www.cpf.navy.mil/Story%20Archive/summer_pulse_3.htm

The bottom line is that there are two carriers which might exercise near Taiwan. This may be sabre-rattling and forward deployment, but this is not unprecedented US pressure on China. The strategic implications of the ability to have 6-8 carriers at sea at any one time are significant, and unlikely to be lost on Beijing, but the threat is not as naked as the post suggests.

HC

#7 from praktike at 8:53 pm on Jul 15, 2004

Interesting factoid: the literal translation of the characters for China are "center country." So when you get into the Taiwan airport, you see the same characters, despite the fact that Taiwan isn't really the center of anything.

#8 from Gary Farber at 9:09 pm on Jul 15, 2004

"The bottom line is that there are two carriers which might exercise near Taiwan. This may be sabre-rattling and forward deployment, but this is not unprecedented US pressure on China."

You're probably right that I should have been clearer and stated that I saw no factual indication that seven carriers were going to the Taiwan Straits.

"The strategic implications of the ability to have 6-8 carriers at sea at any one time are significant, and unlikely to be lost on Beijing, but the threat is not as naked as the post suggests."

Fair point. My point was that Beijing seemed to taking the exercise as aimed directly at them, and that the fact of the revised Fleet Response Plan meant that they had reasonable cause. (See also here.)

#9 from Sam Barnes at 9:55 pm on Jul 15, 2004

praktike,

How about a "center of controversy?" =)

#10 from praktike at 10:18 pm on Jul 15, 2004

Center of motorized scooters?

#11 from Ray at 11:39 pm on Jul 15, 2004

Part of what makes things so dangerous now, is that for the first time since the late 1970s (when the situation was different), China has a divided leadership, which may seek to score points off each other by adopting "tougher than the other guy" positions with respect to Taiwan. That increases the chances that they may be ... less than wise in their behavior.

#12 from mitch p. at 1:17 am on Jul 16, 2004

I wonder if this was partly brought on by fear of opportunism by hostile regional powers in the immediate aftermath of a large Al Qaeda strike in the USA - a demonstration that no matter what, the US can respond quickly and on any front.

#13 from Gary Farber at 1:34 am on Jul 16, 2004

"I wonder if this was partly brought on by fear of opportunism by hostile regional powers in the immediate aftermath of a large Al Qaeda strike in the USA - a demonstration that no matter what, the US can respond quickly and on any front."

I think that although by no means entirely -- for various reasons of force development that are too small to write into the margins of this comment -- to some extent, most definitely. But only in a rather large, and long term, sense. (It does show the flag to Kim Il Jong, but that's a damn complex situation with no sign of short-term combustion.) Just my armchair opinion, of course.

#14 from Tom Roberts at 1:37 am on Jul 16, 2004

In re:
".. these are very significant escalations, unprecedent in their scale on both sides, of force and saber-rattling."

Actually, the current exercises pale in comparison to the US intervention in Korea in 1950. Hopefully the PRC response will be similarly restrained. But your historical comparison is false.

#15 from Gary Farber at 4:09 am on Jul 16, 2004

"Actually, the current exercises pale in comparison to the US intervention in Korea in 1950. Hopefully the PRC response will be similarly restrained. But your historical comparison is false."

Well, yes, to be sure, I hadn't thought it necessary to write "excluding invasions of South Korea." I beg pardon for that omission.

Acheson unwisely didn't mention Korea in the "US perimeter" of defense, and stuff happened. Declaring the resulting invasion of Kim Ill Sung, or, to be sure, the United States response, a "US intervention" is an unusual perspective from my point of view, though not, perhaps, from yours.

#16 from Gary Farber at 5:40 am on Jul 16, 2004

"Part of what makes things so dangerous now, is that for the first time since the late 1970s (when the situation was different), China has a divided leadership, which may seek to score points off each other by adopting "tougher than the other guy" positions with respect to Taiwan."

Darn tootin', as we see here.

#17 from 3dc at 5:54 am on Jul 16, 2004

The wife is staying in Taiwan today with a family friend who is one of their top army generals. She asked him about this issue after I told her about it. He said he wasn't worried at all. Just more bluster by politicans. He was more worried about the strategic battle for promotions in the coming year and which general's factions would come out on top.

#18 from Gary Farber at 6:12 am on Jul 16, 2004

"He said he wasn't worried at all. Just more bluster by politicans. He was more worried about the strategic battle for promotions in the coming year and which general's factions would come out on top."

In this case, that seems almost entirely sensible. On the other hand, with all due respect, honestly, and I apologize for any offense, that sort of attitude is exactly, classically, why the KMT wound up in possession of Taiwan, not China.

#19 from Guy at 7:48 am on Jul 16, 2004

Sure China is growling, but it's a dog that is posed to bite. I've chronicled China's massive military build-up for some time now. What China is doing now is no sabre rattling.

#20 from Gary Farber at 8:31 am on Jul 16, 2004

At this point in discussion I'm now starting to look foward to just how many metaphors we can mix. I'd like to see the dog that can rattle the sabre, myself. Not only is that dog quite a cat, he probably deserves a Taiwanese Generalship.

#21 from hiro bachani at 1:06 pm on Jul 16, 2004

America like all major powers love to divide their opponents or rivals as much as is possible. They did that to china by foisting a taiwan- so that these two countries should constantly bicker among themselves and waste their resources on arms and military spending. Similarly they have weakened india by creating pakistan. Both these countries spend on defence disproportionately high. Pakistan is like a state of india- uttarpradesh- it has 140 million muslims and india has 150 million muslims - so how can pakistan be called the legitimate homeland for muslims of the sub-continent. By harping on the kashmir problem both these countries have been reduced to impotency. If the Saarc nations were smart they would see that these divisions have been created by the imperialists. They can still live with each other under a common SAARC government- resolve their problems- and spend more on human resource development rather than on defence. The Saarc government could be planned in such a manner that pakistan, bangladesh etc get equal importance in ruling with a lot of autonomy.India need not dominate the government since in a democracy there will be sufficient representation for all the states of the SAARC.

#22 from Lurker at 2:25 pm on Jul 16, 2004
Hiro,
They did that to china by foisting a taiwan- so that these two countries should constantly bicker among themselves and waste their resources on arms and military spending. Similarly they have weakened india by creating pakistan.
Perhaps you can explain how America created Taiwan and Pakistan.
If the Saarc nations were smart they would see that these divisions have been created by the imperialists
Did these imperialists create Islam to further their nefarious schemes.

Certainly the various imperialists of the world have much to answer for, but claiming that they are the reason for the division of the sub-continent is obtuse. If only everyone had listened to Gandhi!

#23 from Gary Farber at 3:47 pm on Jul 16, 2004

"Similarly they have weakened india by creating pakistan."

Gosh, it was America that split Imperial India in 1948; who knew? Mohammad Ali Jinnah, and the Moslem League were clearly agents of the, originally, OSS, post COG, then earliest CIA, to be sure, although possibly, earlier, agents of Fu Man Chu. Brits? Never seen, any more than any other history happened in India.

I gotta get me some Hindu mystic guru friends; they seem very handy, and would come in muchly so for this blog.

#24 from Dave Schuler at 1:46 am on Jul 17, 2004

Lurker and Gary Farber:

Well, of course the U. S. created Taiwan and Pakistan. We also installed the French in French Indochina and the Brits in India. Probably goaded the Mongols into sacking Baghdad as well (time travel, very hush-hush).

Post a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.

Finally, note that a constant onslaught of Trackback spams from auto-generated blogspot blogs has forced Winds to ban the blogspot.com domain from use in comments or trackbacks. If you host on blogspot, consider moving; otherwise, the complaints need to be directed at Google not us.










Archives By Category
-FEATURES: 48 Ways to Wisdom (24)
-FEATURES: Diaries & Roundups (10)
-FEATURES: Military Transformation Uplink (12)
-FEATURES: New Energy Currents (20)
-FEATURES: Reader Highlights (2)
-FEATURES: Regional Briefings (166)
-FEATURES: Sufi Wisdom (158)
-FEATURES: The Bard's Breath (32)
-FEATURES: Winds of Discovery (6)
-FEATURES: Winds of War [WoT] (444)
4 HA: 4th-Gen Warfare (102)
4 HA: al-Qaeda (159)
4 HA: Crime, Organized (26)
4 HA: Evil Exists (110)
4 HA: Intelligence/Spycraft (100)
4 HA: Military (521)
4 HA: Nukes, Poisons, Germs (135)
4 HA: Statecraft (29)
4 HA: War on Terror articles (706)
Best Of... (179)
BIZ: Business & Organizations (131)
BIZ: Economics (96)
BIZ: Energy (71)
CIVIS (230)
CIVIS: Copyright Wars (25)
CIVIS: Drug Wars (18)
CIVIS: Edu-Kooks (76)
CIVIS: Free Societies (289)
CIVIS: Hall of Shame (162)
CIVIS: Hatred Rising (114)
CIVIS: Journalism & Media (398)
CIVIS: Spirit of America.NET (31)
CIVIS: War Within the West (309)
COLUMNISTS: M. Simon (13)
COLUMNISTS: Tarek Heggy (33)
GEO: Afghanistan (78)
GEO: Africa (102)
GEO: Asia (116)
GEO: Aussies & Kiwis (20)
GEO: Canada (68)
GEO: China (86)
GEO: Europe (178)
GEO: France (71)
GEO: India-Pakistan (112)
GEO: Iran (223)
GEO: Iraq (957)
GEO: Israel (246)
GEO: Koreas (64)
GEO: Latin America (63)
GEO: Middle East (255)
GEO: Russia (74)
GEO: Saudi Arabia (64)
GEO: Sudan (36)
GEO: U.K. (70)
GEO: U.N. (60)
GEO: U.S. of A (502)
HUMANITY (88)
HUMANITY: Art & Culture (158)
HUMANITY: Art - Music (32)
HUMANITY: Art - Poetry (6)
HUMANITY: Christianity (52)
HUMANITY: Heroes & Achievements (228)
HUMANITY: History (124)
HUMANITY: Islam (182)
HUMANITY: Judaism (136)
HUMANITY: Love (32)
HUMANITY: Philosophy (48)
HUMANITY: Spirituality & Religion (72)
HUMANITY: Zen & Buddhism (28)
Humour (195)
Misc. (42)
NET: Blogosphere (392)
NET: Cyber-Security (16)
NET: Grid Computing (3)
NET: Spam (24)
NET: The Internet (35)
NET: The Open Source Meme (17)
Personal (188)
SCI-TECH: Biotech & Medical (83)
SCI-TECH: Eco-tech (81)
SCI-TECH: Nanotech (27)
SCI-TECH: Science (111)
SCI-TECH: Space (75)
SCI-TECH: Technology (143)
SPORTS (45)
SPORTS: Baseball (75)
Trends (64)
USA: America Catch-all (19)
USA: Anti-Americanism (6)
USA: California Politics (5)
USA: Conservatives & GOP (31)
USA: Dem Party Renewal (71)
USA: Domestic Issues (50)
USA: Elections (84)
USA: Grand Strategy (15)
USA: Homeland Security (106)
VictoryPAC (3)
Winds of Change.NET (49)

Archives by Date
Winds Blogroll


Powered by:
LighTTPD web server
Ubuntu Linux
Movable Type
Hosted by Pixelgate
Support VictoryPAC
Recent Entries

Support Winds of Change.NET!


Your support & assistance is greatly appreciated, and makes a difference!
The Winds Crew:

Town Founder:
Joe Katzman
joe {at} windsofchange. net
Joe's Normblog Interview

Left-Hand Man:
Marc 'Armed Liberal' Danziger
armed {at} windsofchange. net
A.L.'s Normblog Interview

Other Winds Marshals
'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
David Blue (david.blue@...)
'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)

Other Regulars
'Callimachus' (callimachus@...)
'Demosophist' (demosophist@...)
Rev./Maj. Donald Sensing
'Molon Labe' (molon.labe@...)
'Neo Neo-Con'
Tarek Heggy (tarek@...)

Semi-Active:
Arthur Chrenkoff
'Gabriel Gonzalez' (in Paris)
Tim Oren (tim@...)
Trent Telenko (trent@...)

Posting Affiliates
Athena: Terrorism Unveiled
Chester: The Adventures of Chester
Dave Schuler: The Glittering Eye
Grim: Grim's Lair et. al. Joel Gaines [Russia]
Michael Totten
MILblogging.com: The MilBlogs directory
Murdoc [Military]
Situational Awareness team [Military]
Nathan Hamm [Central Asia]
Randy Paul [Latin America]
Robert Koehler [Koreas]
Robi Sen [India & S. Asia]
Nitin Pai [India & S. Asia]
Simon [China & E. Asia]
Yehudit: Kesher Talk

Regular Topic Briefings:
Andrew Olmsted [Iraq Weekly]
Joel Gaines [Iraq Weekly]
Security Watchtower [GWoT Mon.]
Peace Like A River [GWoT Mon.]
Colt [GWoT Thu.]
John Atkinson [Alternative Energy]
Peter Wolfgang [Alternative Energy]
Omri Ceren [Hatewatch]

Emeritus:
Adil Farooq (adil@...)
Celeste Bilby (celeste@...)
Dan Darling
Gary Farber (gary@...)
Hossein Derakhshan (hoder@...)
T.L. James (tljames@...)
Robin Burk (robin@...)


Winds of Change.NET Blogkids & Affiliates

·
The Argus: covering Central Asia
· Canis Iratus: Glen Wishard
· Correct-Amundo: Tech & society
· Discarded Lies: Ev & Zorkie
· The Flying Kiwi: Donovan Janus
· The Glittering Eye: Dave Schuler
· Gumptionology: Nortius Maximus
· Hot Needle of Inquiry: 'Jinnderella'
· Laughing Wolf: C. Blake Powers
· Out The Mazoo: 'Mazoo'
· Power and Control: M. Simon
· Praktike's Place: 'Praktike'
· Random Probabilities: Robin Burk
· Siberian Light: covering Russia
· The Spirit of Man

· Good News From the Front
· WATCH/: covering the war on terror

Archives By Category
-FEATURES: 48 Ways to Wisdom (24)
-FEATURES: Diaries & Roundups (10)
-FEATURES: Military Transformation Uplink (12)
-FEATURES: New Energy Currents (20)
-FEATURES: Reader Highlights (2)
-FEATURES: Regional Briefings (166)
-FEATURES: Sufi Wisdom (158)
-FEATURES: The Bard's Breath (32)
-FEATURES: Winds of Discovery (6)
-FEATURES: Winds of War [WoT] (444)
4 HA: 4th-Gen Warfare (102)
4 HA: al-Qaeda (159)
4 HA: Crime, Organized (26)
4 HA: Evil Exists (110)
4 HA: Intelligence/Spycraft (100)
4 HA: Military (521)
4 HA: Nukes, Poisons, Germs (135)
4 HA: Statecraft (29)
4 HA: War on Terror articles (706)
Best Of... (179)
BIZ: Business & Organizations (131)
BIZ: Economics (96)
BIZ: Energy (71)
CIVIS (230)
CIVIS: Copyright Wars (25)
CIVIS: Drug Wars (18)
CIVIS: Edu-Kooks (76)
CIVIS: Free Societies (289)
CIVIS: Hall of Shame (162)
CIVIS: Hatred Rising (114)
CIVIS: Journalism & Media (398)
CIVIS: Spirit of America.NET (31)
CIVIS: War Within the West (309)
COLUMNISTS: M. Simon (13)
COLUMNISTS: Tarek Heggy (33)
GEO: Afghanistan (78)
GEO: Africa (102)
GEO: Asia (116)
GEO: Aussies & Kiwis (20)
GEO: Canada (68)
GEO: China (86)
GEO: Europe (178)
GEO: France (71)
GEO: India-Pakistan (112)
GEO: Iran (223)
GEO: Iraq (957)
GEO: Israel (246)
GEO: Koreas (64)
GEO: Latin America (63)
GEO: Middle East (255)
GEO: Russia (74)
GEO: Saudi Arabia (64)
GEO: Sudan (36)
GEO: U.K. (70)
GEO: U.N. (60)
GEO: U.S. of A (502)
HUMANITY (88)
HUMANITY: Art & Culture (158)
HUMANITY: Art - Music (32)
HUMANITY: Art - Poetry (6)
HUMANITY: Christianity (52)
HUMANITY: Heroes & Achievements (228)
HUMANITY: History (124)
HUMANITY: Islam (182)
HUMANITY: Judaism (136)
HUMANITY: Love (32)
HUMANITY: Philosophy (48)
HUMANITY: Spirituality & Religion (72)
HUMANITY: Zen & Buddhism (28)
Humour (195)
Misc. (42)
NET: Blogosphere (392)
NET: Cyber-Security (16)
NET: Grid Computing (3)
NET: Spam (24)
NET: The Internet (35)
NET: The Open Source Meme (17)
Personal (188)
SCI-TECH: Biotech & Medical (83)
SCI-TECH: Eco-tech (81)
SCI-TECH: Nanotech (27)
SCI-TECH: Science (111)
SCI-TECH: Space (75)
SCI-TECH: Technology (143)
SPORTS (45)
SPORTS: Baseball (75)
Trends (64)
USA: America Catch-all (19)
USA: Anti-Americanism (6)
USA: California Politics (5)
USA: Conservatives & GOP (31)
USA: Dem Party Renewal (71)
USA: Domestic Issues (50)
USA: Elections (84)
USA: Grand Strategy (15)
USA: Homeland Security (106)
VictoryPAC (3)
Winds of Change.NET (49)

Archives by Date
Winds Blogroll


Powered by:
LighTTPD web server
Ubuntu Linux
Movable Type
Hosted by Pixelgate