|
September 12, 2004North Korea Bomb Test?by Joe Katzman at September 12, 2004 6:59 AM
There have been some reports filtering through lately that North Korea may have tested an atomic weapon on Sept. 9th, the holiday that commemorates North Korea's founding. There were even some preliminary reports from Russian sources of an imminent test. Today's NY Times has more. Now there's also news of a huge explosion in Yanggang province and a mushroom cloud 3.5-4 kilometers, or 2.2-2.5 miles, in diameter that was visible from satellite on that day. The nature of that explosion is unconfirmed at present. Even a large mushroom cloud can still be a conventional explosion. CNN is reporting that it is not a nuclear explosion, but their reasoning is odd. Mind you, it was near a known missile base so it could be a major accident. As an aside, Agence France Press reports that the explosion seems to have been larger than the massive Ryongchon train blast this April 22. That's very big indeed, as the Ryongchon photos demonstrate. MORE UPDATES: Not big enough to show on Alaskan seismographs, though, says David Schneider-Joseph. M. Simon's new blog tells us what else to look for. Meanwhile, Trent Telenko notes:
for a quick history of the NK nuclear program, try Brit Broadcasting Conservatism. For an overall assessment of what NK is doing, Prof. Sung-Yoon Lee of the Fletcher School of Diplomacy at Tufts has some sobering thoughts. Anyone with further links, data, or what have you, please use this comments section or email "joe" and/or "dan" here @windsofchange.net. The team will be keeping you updated as this story develops. Here's an ongoing Google News tracker, too. NOTE: Please use the simple formatting instructions for creating live links, in order to avoid blowing up the front page template. Thanks! Tracked: September 12, 2004 9:06 AM
BREAKING NEWS -- Blast, mushroom cloud reported in North Korea from The Marmot's Hole
Excerpt: Whatever this is, it cannot be good:
SEOUL, South Korea - A large explosion occurred in the northern part of North Korea (news - web sites), sending a huge mushroom cloud into the air on an important anniversary of the communist regime, a South Korean...
Tracked: September 12, 2004 10:00 AM
North Korean Explosion Not Nuclear from CALIFORNIA YANKEE
Excerpt: CNN reports that the huge explosion that shook North Korea's northernmost province on Thursday and produced a mushroom cloud was not the result of a nuclear explosion. The explosion was reported to have taken place "not far" from a military
Tracked: September 12, 2004 2:47 PM
How could I have missed this one? from On The Third Hand
Excerpt: Winds of Change did a big roundup of Sept 11 posts and sites. Well worth reading, even on Sept 12.
Tracked: September 12, 2004 5:03 PM
Large Mushroom Cloud Observed in North Korea from Blogs of War
Excerpt: A reliable source in Seoul’s diplomatic community says Sunday a mushroom cloud with a radius of 3.5 to 4 kilometers was spotted in Kimhyongjik County in North Korea’s northernmost inland province of Yanggang on Sept. 9.
Tracked: September 12, 2004 9:58 PM
North Kerea May Have Tesed Nuclear Weapons from Passionate America
Excerpt: I believe it was a nuclear explosion. If we [bloggers] can prove that it was a nuclear explosion, Bush should test a few nukes in North Korea.
Tracked: September 13, 2004 3:42 AM
North Korea And Nukes from Diggers Realm
Excerpt: A large mushroom cloud explosion in Nrth Korea on Thursday was reportedly not a nuclear explosion. Yahoo AP A huge mushroom cloud that reportedly billowed up from North Korea was not caused by a nuclear explosion, South Korean and U.S....
Tracked: September 13, 2004 8:44 AM
North Korea And Nukes from Diggers Realm
Excerpt: A large mushroom cloud explosion in North Korea on Thursday was reportedly not a nuclear explosion. Yahoo AP A huge mushroom cloud that reportedly billowed up from North Korea was not caused by a nuclear explosion, South Korean and U.S....
Comments
Don't be surprised if South Koreans suddenly rediscover that they loves America and are our closest ally. I say, let them handle the Nut of the North. The security of the South Korean ingrates is not worth the life of one American soldier. CNN.com is quoting an unnamed US government official saying that it is not a nuke blast. Though it's old media so that should probably be taken with a grain of salt. At this point I'm inclined to be skeptical toward any conclusion until we get more and better information.
#3 from Tom Holsinger at 7:44 am on Sep 12, 2004
I found it at Captain's Quarters here - and there's also a Yahoo! story Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea
#4 from Tom Holsinger at 7:46 am on Sep 12, 2004
#5 from cerberus at 7:46 am on Sep 12, 2004
CNN seems to be the only one that is reporting "not a nuke" at the moment. However, some caution is probably called for at this point, since this is breaking news, and we should all know by now how that goes. I, for one, am kind of wondering why this hasn't broken until now. If it really was a nuclear detonation, the spy satellites that the US doubtless has tasked to the area should have picked up the gamma ray flash instantly. I'm looking forward to the comments by various officials in the morning...
#6 from Pete Stanley at 8:49 am on Sep 12, 2004
Forest fire that leaves a crater, huh? My ass.
#7 from lindenen at 8:53 am on Sep 12, 2004
Forest fire that manages to take the form of a mushroom cloud! Yeah, right. My money is on that it's not a nuke test. Something tells me that if it were, we'd have heard about it before now (as the explosion took place on Thursday). At this point, who the hell knows. The Unification Minister gave a briefing this afternoon here in Seoul and said for now they feel it wasn't nuclear related, although he didn't say why. Basically, everyone is rushing to confirm what was said. The S. Korean media is full of speculation -- could have been a nuke, could have been a test of some other sort, could have been a major accident, might have been nothing at all. I read reports that those living on the other side of the Sino-Korean border didn't notice anything unsual, although they did point out that a mushroom cloud might have been obscured by the mountains. Interestingly enough, the Korean press is doing a lot of regurgitation of the foreign press, i.e., "The NYT reported....," which is ironic given that it was Yonhap that broke the story. That's another thing -- the Yonhap piece quoted a "Chinese source familiar with the North Korean situation," which in Korean, could mean anything. It also quoted other sources -- all living in China -- as saying they heard "rumors" of an explosion. I'm not saying something didn't happen, but until we get a nice satellite shot or a picture of a pretty mushroom cloud, I'd be very careful with this story at the moment. I'll try to keep things going at my blog, too. When it's working, that is. PS: To answer your question over at my blog, I doubt these leaks of S. Korean nuclear experiments had anything to do with suspicions concerning recent N. Korean moves. Frankly, the way that whole mess is playing out in Seoul, I don't think any planning went into it. It's just a mess, and embarrassing to everyone involved. Coincidentally, the North Koreans have been exceptionally harsh on Seoul following that news, and the Unification Minister's briefing concentrated more on N. Korea's reaction to S. Korea's nuclear experiments and the way it would influence the six-party talks than on the explosion in N. Korea. In fact, he hardly said anything about the later other than "We're trying to confirm what took place," and "We don't think it was a nuke test." Some analysis here.
#10 from ronb at 10:17 am on Sep 12, 2004
Yeah. They launch their liquid-fuelled rockets from there. Big bang, big fire. This just in -- S. Korean gov't just confirmed explosion and mushroom cloud, said it was non-nuclear. Apparently three times larger than Ryongchon. Speculation is that it was an arms depot going up, as the area has a ton of munitions factories. I wouldn't be surprised if the North KOreans tried to launch a Daepodong and things didn't quite work out as well as they planned. I'll link when the English version comes out.
#12 from T. J. Madison at 12:00 pm on Sep 12, 2004
Hey, maybe some CIA guys managed to arrange a little "accident" like the stunt they pulled with the Siberian pipeline network. (snicker) That's the problem with running a corrupt totalitarian Commie government: it's difficult to sort out foreign sabotage from the background noise of mind-numbing incompetence. (Come to think of it, it's rather difficult to do that with ANY government.) It will take a bigger air blast for a given seismic reaction than with an underground blast. Of course tthe wave (pulse) in the atmosphere would be larger. Mushroom cloud means an aboveground test. Aboveground means fallout. That means that people would be picking up the radioactivity. The Japanese would have seen it first. Then US detectors, and not just government ones. I don't think everybody could sit on the info. Plus, the Chinese would freaked out since it was right on their border. Articles say that this was at/near a North Korean missile base. They seem to be having problems with their missile program - they got detected hiding them under concrete bags on ships, that train blew up and killed all those Syrian missile techs. And now this. What an entirely coincidental string of bad luck for NoKo missile guys.
#15 from jinnderella at 2:52 pm on Sep 12, 2004
Joe: We have operational sensors that test for Krypton 85 emmission, those would have radically elevated readings, the Chinese have them also-- I agree with Blaster that this was prob'ly conventional, given the timing. A 'celebratory' blast. The fall-out radius combined with the date argue against an accident.
#16 from Trent Telenko at 3:38 pm on Sep 12, 2004
This sounds like a major communist arms depot or rocket fuel factory going up. The Soviet North Seas fleet lost it's primary weapons storage depot in the late 1980's when some of its ammunition went up either spontaniously or through incompetence and wiped out 80% of the North Seas Fleet's ammunition. Being as the majority of it was things like torpedos, cruise missiles, anti-aircraft missiles and rockets. The Fleet never again achieved combat readiness before the Soviet Union fell. The blast that happened at an American solid rocket plant in the late 1980s or early 1990's was near nuclear in size and it slowed Shuttle and TitanIV launches for six months due to a lack of solid rocket motor fuel. Given what Scuds used as fuel, that mushroom cloud was likely pure poison made up of red fuming nitric acid and hydrazine. Help us fight injustice in Iran. Please sign our petition opposing the death penalty for minors. http://www.petitiononline.com/coceii/petition.html Even though this wasn't a nuclear test, the increased level of suspicious activity recently is worrying - especially as there's likely to be a lull in U.S. policy initiative towards the DPRK before November. There's a bunch of links and history at my blog . I'm guessing this is a conventional explosion. If the DPRK were testing their nukes, it would also be a display of their official entry into the Nuclear Club. With the test would be great proclamations, grandstanding, with every horn of the regime would be trumpeting their great triumph. That would be the point of a test. We saw this sort of thing when Pakistan tested their nukes. Instead, none of that has occurred. Just silence. TACITUS
#20 from jinnderella at 3:54 pm on Sep 12, 2004
Joe: Colin Powell on Meet the Press just said it was conventional. I have to wonder if lil Kim intended at least his civilian pop to believe it was nuclear.
#21 from Bob Harmon at 4:08 pm on Sep 12, 2004
The explosion Trent mentioned in the Soviet fleet may have been the 1984 explosion at Sevoromorsk, which involved the Red Banner Northern Fleet. Something about the rocket storage (propellants), and apparently it was major enough to look as big as a nuclear explosion. To a previous poster, it is vaguely possible for a forest fire or other large fire to form a mushroom cloud. The cloud over Oakland, CA, on Oct. 20, 1991 around 11:15 am -- just as the Oakland Hills fire was really getting under way -- did look somewhat mushroom shaped from the angle I saw it from the north west (rainbow edges, no less). Difference of course is it didn't keep that shape and quickly expanded downwind.
#22 from E. Phlips at 6:32 pm on Sep 12, 2004
I've got to wonder again if they had the retired CIA 'remote viewer' on the radio again(psyops 60's)who has predicted the end of the earth from asteroids after the new shuttle program is started(post crash). He predicts big explosion on border and I'll be damned if it happens a week later. Its not the nuclear border defense,but a train full of fuel for the winter. They probably still need a replacement. As far as seeing the future, I think the TV at the UN works better and you don't have to worry about the making sure there is a mistake(i.e.Lucifer type stuff) in time, etc. Anyway, I thought these famous bloggers would have an answer by now...........
#23 from jinnderella at 6:39 pm on Sep 12, 2004
Joe: The Krypton 85 sensors on the borders can detect underground tests and increased uranium enrichment activity as well.
#24 from ATM at 1:26 am on Sep 13, 2004
I recall reading on one of the Korean blogs that defectors have said there is a resistance movement in NoKo. Maybe they are responsible. Witnesses in South Korea saw a huge mushroom-shaped cloud and felt tremors. A satellite showed a substantial crater in the ground. Yet Colin Powell is not sure that North Korea was testing a nuke??! Tom Uh... nobody in South Korea saw any mushroom clouds or felt any tremors unless they were on mushrooms themselves. This story broke here in Seoul the same day it broke in the rest of the world -- five days after the explosion. In fact, they are having trouble getting witnesses from the town just across the border in China who saw a mushroom cloud. I'm not sure which story you got that from, but when the Korean versions say the South Koreans detected a cloud, they are referring to satellite imagery and other methods, not with the naked eye. This just in -- BBC reported that NK Foreign Minister Paek Nam-sun explained to visiting UK Foreign Office Minister Bill Rammell that the explosion was a planned demolition of a mountain linked to the planned construction of a hydroelectric power station. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3650702.stm Nice of them to say something, at least.
#28 from mitch p. at 6:57 am on Sep 13, 2004
How do you demolish a mountain, except with a nuke?
#29 from Whitehall at 11:40 am on Sep 13, 2004
Immediately prior to a North Korean nuclear test would be a grand time to drop a couple or three MOABs. I suspect a counterforce first strike. Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part.... Whitehall: it is. Old Persian saying: never wound a king. South Korea is effectively complicit in propping up North Korea's regime at the moment, and will not help in any way. American troops in Korea are based in range of North Korean artillery. Worst-case planning says that a strike on North Korea = loss of those troops, and loss of any U.S. presence in Korea too. Which means a Korea that falls into China's orbit (this is China's current goal, and helps explain why they continue to be the NK regime's biggest backers - as well as why the USA hasn't just left). Anything you do has to have an effect that justifies those potential losses, as well as the political blowback.
#31 from Bob Harmon at 12:05 am on Sep 14, 2004
And now, FWIW, the North Koreans say the blast was the planned demolition of a mountain for a hydroelectric project. Interesting comment in the story about it having a "ring of truth" to it. Last time we heard about a ring and a mountain, it was fantasy, but -- we'll see, won't we? I don't condemn misile tests, if any by Korea, because a country has the right to make its defence stronger by inventing new misiles.
#33 from Peter (JK: "naushadm_22@yahoo.com") at 5:47 pm on Apr 13, 2006
I guess there should be no objection if Korea is testing new missiles because every country has the rights to defend its territories.
#34 from Stevie at 1:56 pm on Oct 09, 2006
China is key, literally.
Post a comment
Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags: |
You're Reading an Individual Post!
If you want to head to the main blog page, just follow the "Main" link in the navigation up top underneath our blog's name. Or click here:
Winds of Change.NET Home
Winds of Change Library
Support VictoryPAC
Recent Entries
· Going Solar, Chapter 2
· The Funniest Thing I've Heard All Day... · Well, I Know Who I Won't Be Voting For For Governor · Someone At The New York Times Is A Monty Python Fan... · An Experiment On Blog Diffusion... · The Bin Ladens of the Balkans, Part I · On The Road Again (Literally, this time)...and a few passing thoughts. · The Truth about March 14 · Mr. Smith Goes To Topeka · Is the War Over? · An Abominable Blood-Logged Plain · Back On The Road This Week · Responding To Chris H On Patriotism · Guns At Home · Guns In The Woods
Support Winds of Change.NET!
Your support & assistance is greatly appreciated, and makes a difference!
The Winds Crew:
Town Founder: Joe Katzman joe {at} windsofchange. net Joe's Normblog Interview Left-Hand Man: Marc 'Armed Liberal' Danziger armed {at} windsofchange. net A.L.'s Normblog Interview Other Winds Marshals 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...) Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...) David Blue (david.blue@...) 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...) 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...) Other Regulars 'Callimachus' (callimachus@...) 'Demosophist' (demosophist@...) Rev./Maj. Donald Sensing 'Molon Labe' (molon.labe@...) 'Neo Neo-Con' Tarek Heggy (tarek@...) Semi-Active: Arthur Chrenkoff 'Gabriel Gonzalez' (in Paris) Tim Oren (tim@...) Trent Telenko (trent@...) Posting Affiliates Athena: Terrorism Unveiled Chester: The Adventures of Chester Dave Schuler: The Glittering Eye Grim: Grim's Lair et. al. Joel Gaines [Russia] Michael Totten MILblogging.com: The MilBlogs directory Murdoc [Military] Situational Awareness team [Military] Nathan Hamm [Central Asia] Randy Paul [Latin America] Robert Koehler [Koreas] Robi Sen [India & S. Asia] Nitin Pai [India & S. Asia] Simon [China & E. Asia] Yehudit: Kesher Talk Regular Topic Briefings: Andrew Olmsted [Iraq Weekly] Joel Gaines [Iraq Weekly] Security Watchtower [GWoT Mon.] Peace Like A River [GWoT Mon.] Colt [GWoT Thu.] John Atkinson [Alternative Energy] Peter Wolfgang [Alternative Energy] Omri Ceren [Hatewatch] Emeritus: Adil Farooq (adil@...) Celeste Bilby (celeste@...) Dan Darling Gary Farber (gary@...) Hossein Derakhshan (hoder@...) T.L. James (tljames@...) Robin Burk (robin@...)
Winds of Change.NET Blogkids & Affiliates
· The Argus: covering Central Asia · Canis Iratus: Glen Wishard · Correct-Amundo: Tech & society · Discarded Lies: Ev & Zorkie · The Flying Kiwi: Donovan Janus · The Glittering Eye: Dave Schuler · Gumptionology: Nortius Maximus · Hot Needle of Inquiry: 'Jinnderella' · Laughing Wolf: C. Blake Powers · Out The Mazoo: 'Mazoo' · Power and Control: M. Simon · Praktike's Place: 'Praktike' · Random Probabilities: Robin Burk · Siberian Light: covering Russia · The Spirit of Man · Good News From the Front · WATCH/: covering the war on terror
Archives By Category
-FEATURES: 48 Ways to Wisdom (24)
-FEATURES: Diaries & Roundups (10) -FEATURES: Military Transformation Uplink (12) -FEATURES: New Energy Currents (20) -FEATURES: Reader Highlights (2) -FEATURES: Regional Briefings (166) -FEATURES: Sufi Wisdom (158) -FEATURES: The Bard's Breath (32) -FEATURES: Winds of Discovery (6) -FEATURES: Winds of War [WoT] (444) 4 HA: 4th-Gen Warfare (102) 4 HA: al-Qaeda (159) 4 HA: Crime, Organized (26) 4 HA: Evil Exists (110) 4 HA: Intelligence/Spycraft (100) 4 HA: Military (521) 4 HA: Nukes, Poisons, Germs (135) 4 HA: Statecraft (29) 4 HA: War on Terror articles (706) Best Of... (179) BIZ: Business & Organizations (131) BIZ: Economics (96) BIZ: Energy (71) CIVIS (230) CIVIS: Copyright Wars (25) CIVIS: Drug Wars (18) CIVIS: Edu-Kooks (76) CIVIS: Free Societies (289) CIVIS: Hall of Shame (162) CIVIS: Hatred Rising (114) CIVIS: Journalism & Media (398) CIVIS: Spirit of America.NET (31) CIVIS: War Within the West (309) COLUMNISTS: M. Simon (13) COLUMNISTS: Tarek Heggy (33) GEO: Afghanistan (78) GEO: Africa (102) GEO: Asia (116) GEO: Aussies & Kiwis (20) GEO: Canada (68) GEO: China (86) GEO: Europe (178) GEO: France (71) GEO: India-Pakistan (112) GEO: Iran (223) GEO: Iraq (957) GEO: Israel (246) GEO: Koreas (64) GEO: Latin America (63) GEO: Middle East (255) GEO: Russia (74) GEO: Saudi Arabia (64) GEO: Sudan (36) GEO: U.K. (70) GEO: U.N. (60) GEO: U.S. of A (502) HUMANITY (88) HUMANITY: Art & Culture (158) HUMANITY: Art - Music (32) HUMANITY: Art - Poetry (6) HUMANITY: Christianity (52) HUMANITY: Heroes & Achievements (228) HUMANITY: History (124) HUMANITY: Islam (182) HUMANITY: Judaism (136) HUMANITY: Love (32) HUMANITY: Philosophy (48) HUMANITY: Spirituality & Religion (72) HUMANITY: Zen & Buddhism (28) Humour (195) Misc. (42) NET: Blogosphere (392) NET: Cyber-Security (16) NET: Grid Computing (3) NET: Spam (24) NET: The Internet (35) NET: The Open Source Meme (17) Personal (188) SCI-TECH: Biotech & Medical (83) SCI-TECH: Eco-tech (81) SCI-TECH: Nanotech (27) SCI-TECH: Science (111) SCI-TECH: Space (75) SCI-TECH: Technology (143) SPORTS (45) SPORTS: Baseball (75) Trends (64) USA: America Catch-all (19) USA: Anti-Americanism (6) USA: California Politics (5) USA: Conservatives & GOP (31) USA: Dem Party Renewal (71) USA: Domestic Issues (50) USA: Elections (84) USA: Grand Strategy (15) USA: Homeland Security (106) VictoryPAC (3) Winds of Change.NET (49)
Archives by Date
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 Joe's Old Archives, By Title: April - June 2002 July - December 2002
Winds Blogroll
Top Prospects
Support VictoryPACSP Normblog (LHP) SP Solomonia (RHP) RF Mader Blog CF Donklephant LF Harry's Place C Critical Mass 1B Tigerhawk 2B Gideon's Blog SS Alexander the Average 3B Democracy Arsenal UT INF Pundita DH Counterterrorism Blog PEN Liberals Against Terrorism CL Gates of Vienna MASCOT Huffington's Toast MGR Robert Tagorda GM Conservative Grapevine Humour Blogs · Cox & Forkum (cartoons) · Day By Day (cartoons) · User Friendly (cartoons) · AllahPundit (satire) · Scrappleface (satire) Religious Blogs · Conscientia (baha'i) · Unlearned Hand (bud) · Eve Tushnet (cath) · Muslim Under Progress (isl) · Ideofact (isl) · Kesher Talk (jew) · Rabbi Lazer Brody (jew) · Rishon Rishon (jew) · Rev. Donald Sensing (prot) Other Team Memberships · Command Post [All] · No End But Victory [All] · AlwaysOn [JK] Blog Services · NZ Bear's Ecosystem · Blogstreet · Daypop Top 40 · Technorati · Movable Type.org · Write A Better Blog More entries coming! |
http://www.windsofchange.net/windsopcentre-cms/trackback.cgi/3258
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
"North Korea Bomb Test?"