Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Open Thread: The 1st 2004 Presidential Debate

| 15 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Open thread where readers et. al. can post your reactions and discuss in the comments section. I'm teaching at U of T tonight, so liveblogging will not be an option for me.

One thing... there had better be some serious discussion about Iran by the candidates, or I'm going to be really annoyed.

1 TrackBack

Tracked: October 1, 2004 1:36 PM
Presidential Debates: Round 1 from No Pundit Intended
Excerpt: Full Story The first round of debates, covering foreign policy, the war on terror and Iraq was just a little more aggressive than the first round in any boxing match.

15 Comments

I predict you'll be annoyed.

I've been covering Iran more extensively lately.

The wild and crazy Dr. Yazdi

Up the Revolution

On the verge

It will be interesting to see if the Iranians can drive the mullahs out before the mullahs get the bomb.

Sorry, we don't have any Army left to invade Iran.

I'm back, just in time for Bush's "Osama bin Laden doesn't get to decide..." shot at Kerry. Oooooh, that one's gonna hurt in the morning.

If I were Kerry, I don't think I'd keep talking about "when I came back from the war..." That's the very weakest part of his personal history, and every time he does it he's inviting future attacks. And, inexplicably, he keeps doing it. I don't get it.

On the bright side, he's better at short answers than I expected.

So, Joe, was I right or was I right?

I am in the process of composing a post about how much your candidates suck.

Tell us something we don't know.

Frankly I thought Kerry bent Bush over, spanked him, and made Bush shout "You're my daddy!" Which surprises the heck out of me.

Most of the time, both candidates did okay.

But there were times, when Bush, while Kerry was talking, just looked like he was going to lose it - sort of a mini- Zell Miller. (Again, only occasionally.)

His mouth twisted up, he gets this contemptuous look on his face - what's he so pissed about?

what's he so pissed about?

Jealousy. His friend Vladimir doesn't have to debate any more.

Did you guys notice that Kerry offers to give radiactive material to Iran? Wow! This guy is utterly stupid. "Arm thy enemy" says his Book. Wow!

KERRY: "With respect to Iran, the British, French, and Germans were the ones who initiated an effort without the United States, regrettably, to begin to try to move to curb the nuclear possibilities in Iran. I believe we could have done better. I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see whether or not they were actually looking for it for peaceful purposes. If they weren't willing to work a deal, then we could have put sanctions together. The president did nothing."

This is not a new initiative. Iran states they wish to develop nuclear technology for energy production. To do this they will need enriched uranium. Enriched uranium may be used in power reactors. Highly enriched uranium (weapons grade) can be used in bombs with more highly enriched nuclear cores producing greater destructive yields. By controlling and monitoring what nuclear materials a regime such as Iran's possesses, we stand a greater chance of limiting their aims to produce destructive weapons. A country either has a broad program to enrich uranium, or it doesn't. It is a very costly and deliberate process. By providing them uranium that is not useful for weapons but is compatible with energy production, it calls their bluff and any further monitoring that turns up evidence of an uranium enrichment process places them in default.

Or we could be petulant say any development of nuclear research will be met with force. Only we do not have suitable force to occupy the entire Mideast and Korea. Nuclear proliferation has been a significant problem since 1948. The means of controlling and monitoring its spread is complex, but tested.

Tested, and found wanting.

Bush could have fired back and noted that Iran has rejected all such arrangements, openly declares its "right" to conduct its nuclear program with no external encumbrances, and is openly declaring moves to begin enriching uranium.

You don't need to call the Iranians' bluff. They've called it themselves. And the European initiative is a charade that Iran laugs at openly. They are 4-6 months away, and sanctions won't stop anything. Even assuming that the Europeans would implement and enforce them - which they won't.

Seemed to me as I watched it that substsantively it was a wash. I doubt either of them said anything that will change any minds or make up any undecided minds. The latest CNN poll backs me up on that. Stylistically, as much as I hate to say it (me being a Bush voter and all) Kerry took it. He seemed relaxed, comfortable, confident and articulate. Bush seemed nervous and defensive, stuttered a few times, and fairly frequently seemed to lose his train of thought. Fortunately for W, this debate didn't seem to move the polls much, but if he does this badly in the next two debates, he could be in trouble.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • Perry The Cynic: What will it take? The effective destruction of the "media-industrial read more
  • Tom West: And while experimentation in astronomy and cosmology is scarce, observation read more
  • Glen Wishard: Years ago the philosopher Robert Nozick asked: why don't unions read more
  • Foobarista: The Dems haven't been the party of the "little guy" read more
  • Chris: Actually, this is good. You're boldly stating that you know read more
  • Armed Liberal: Tom, you're right that nuclear weapons design today is entirely read more
  • charris208.myopenid.com: Total destruction. The Democratic Party has been the party of read more
  • Tom West: While I agree with the sentiment, I have to say read more
  • Armed Liberal: I can't believe we're still back here. And here's Judith read more
  • Chris: If you can point to a respectable number of examples read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris sometimes arguing with you is like living in "The read more
  • Chris: Chris, if you think there are no experiments in evolutionary read more
  • Armed Liberal: As opposed, of course, to today's Michael Mann quote: Who read more
  • Chris: You are aware that the same person whose "peer reviewed" read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris, if you think there are no experiments in evolutionary read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en